Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06829
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01642
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01554
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Abrams v. Bloomberg, L.P. et al
as 1:2009cv06537
Plaintiff: Mark Abrams
Defendant: Bloomberg, L.P. , Adam Goldsmith and Max Linnington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv06242
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Steven Hatfill v. Baltimore Sun Company
as 08-5049
Plaintiff - Appellee: Steven J. Hatfill, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee: Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Defendant - Appellant: Toni Locy
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: ALM Media, Inc., American Society of Newspaper Editors, Associated Press and others
Movant - Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Daily News, L.P., Reuters America LLC, The Authors Guild, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv08383
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06906
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?