Cases 1 - 10 of 79
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
as 2:2013cv20000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs' Counsel, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Judy Sheridan and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., BCBSM, Inc.,, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and others
Special Master:
Special Master
In Re:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
Respondent:
Baycare Health System, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Alaska Air Group Inc et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Albertsons Companies Inc Health and Welfare Plan, Walgreen Health and Welfare Plan (Plan No 501), Alaska Air Group Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc, Aware Integrated Inc and BCBSM Inc d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (together "Aware"), Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 4:2019cv03791
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, HealthNow New York, Inc., Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis and Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv01765
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, Anthem Health Plans Inc, National Account Service Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Bruce Norvell v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass, et al
as 19-35705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE A. NORVELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST HEALTH LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
