Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Berns v. IMCC State Psychiatric Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Henry Michael Berns
Defendant:
IMCC State Psychiatric Hospital, Advanced Systems Healthcare, Clayton County Sheriffs Office/Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risdal v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Eddie C. Risdal
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Kim Reynolds, Story County Iowa Board of Supervisors and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoxsey v. Scott County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lovell Hoxsey
Defendant:
Scott County Board of Supervisors, Tim Lane, S. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddie Risdal v. Kimberly Reynolds, et al
as 23-1546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie C. Risdal
Defendant / Appellee:
Kimberly Reynolds, State of iowa Governor, Department of Human Services, Director, Department of Corrections, Director and others
Risdal v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Eddie C. Risdal
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Department of Human Services, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2018cv02078
Defendant:
Black Hawk County, Iowa, Black Hawk County Board of Supervisors, Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mumin v. Koontz et al
as 5:2009cv04074
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Iqraa Jihad Mumin
Defendant:
John Koontz, Gary Lauderville, Ney T McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risdal et al v. Scott et al
as 5:2008cv04043
Petitioner:
Eddie C Risdal and Mystery Boy Inc
Respondent:
Dave Scott, Cherokee County Board of Supervisors, Matt Royster and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
