Cases 1 - 7 of 7
JACKSON et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13598
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JACKSON and THE ESTATE OF BARBARA JACKSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JACKSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18523
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC)
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE JACKSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv02055
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton et al v. Zimmer Holdings Inc et al
as 2:2018cv17108
Plaintiff:
Danny Newton and Bobbie Jackson Newton
Defendant:
ZIMMER INC and ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC
In Re:
ZIMMER DUROM HIP CUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32563
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JACKSON
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JACKSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66722
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JACKSON, BOBBY JACKSON, VIRGIL SEE and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., JOHN CRANE INC, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jackson v. Williamson
as 3:2007cv00544
Petitioner:
Bobby Jackson
Respondent:
Troy Williamson and Troy Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
