Cases 1 - 10 of 2,747
Leal v. Lumpkin
as 24-10391
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Leal
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Anderson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01681
Petitioner:
DLance Chazion Anderson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joiner v. Lumpkin
as 24-50339
Petitioner:
Joseph V. Joiner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Taylor v. TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Mikey Ray Taylor, Jr. and Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 24-50333
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40314
Petitioner:
Antonio A. Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40306
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40308
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40309
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
