Cases 11 - 20 of 2,757
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rpgers and Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Isaac Cardenas
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otis v. Lumpkin
as 24-40297
Petitioner:
Kerron L. Otis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 24-40307
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40305
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Ortiz v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Anthony Ortiz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00850
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00855
Petitioner:
Roderick Bernard Douglas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
