Cases 21 - 30 of 3,307
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40314
Petitioner:
Antonio A. Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 24-50333
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rpgers and Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40306
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40308
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40309
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Ortiz v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Anthony Ortiz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otis v. Lumpkin
as 24-40297
Petitioner:
Kerron L. Otis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
