Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Moses v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Robert Arthur Moses
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01114
Petitioner:
Aaron Wade Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz-Banegas v. TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01033
Petitioner:
Kenneth Said Cruz-Banegas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieves-Perez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
Felipe Nieves-Perez
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCullough v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Jared D. McCullough
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Perez, Cedric Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dillion Compton
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, The TDCJ Director's Review Committe, Ronald Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00488
Petitioner:
Ricardo Latrelle Taylor
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Busby v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bryan L. Williams, Dr Kevin B Smith, Anthony J Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 9:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Willie James Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
