Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Boggs v. Citywide Mobile Response
as 1:2022cv10238
Plaintiff:
Jared J. Boggs
Defendant:
Citywide Mobile Response
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv06750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Syville et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv00570
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson, Calvin Daniels, Anthony McDonald and others
Defendant:
Sera Security, Mayor Bill Deblasio, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Kozlowski et al
as 1:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Gilette, Knezevic, Weig and others
Plaintiff:
Tawana R. Wyatt, as Administratrix of the Estate of India T. Cummings and Tawana R. Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nayman v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv05816
Defendant:
Paula Boggs, Esq., Christopher C. Paci, Esq. and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Irwin Nayman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boggs et al v. Town Of Riverhead et al
as 2:2017cv05411
Plaintiff:
Elendell Boggs and Randy Mouzon
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Law Enforcement Agents John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10, New York State Law Enforcement Agents John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Standard et al v. Madison et al
as 3:2014cv00754
Plaintiff:
Tracy A. Standard, T. S. and L. S.
Defendant:
Town of Madison, John Drumm, John Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berbick et al v. Housing and Urban Dev et al
as 3:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Yolanda L Berbick and Clive O Berbick
Defendant:
Dept of Housing and Urban Dev, Amziah Craig, Patricia Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Jaconelli v. Boggs
as 3:2008cv01202
Plaintiff:
Guy Jaconelli
Defendant:
Ernest Boggs
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
