Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bostic v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16449
Plaintiff:
Vida Bostic
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bostic v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv13534
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bostic
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bostic v. Loreal USA Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08804
Plaintiff:
Lia Bostic
Defendant:
Loreal USA Products, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bostic v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50398
Petitioner:
James Tristan Bostic
Respondent:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bostic v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2020cv01391
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Petitioner:
Dana Bostic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04121
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Beverly Tew, christopher keller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
United States of America v. Bostic
as 1:2017cv01645
Defendant:
Dana Bostic
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bostic v. Shah et al
as 3:2015cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert Bostic
Defendant:
Vipen Shah, Cantina Food Services, Susan Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
