Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Anderson v. Bowers Towing et al.
as 5:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Defendant:
Bowers Towing and Akron Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv03368
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Sondra L. Bowers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bowers et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02858
Plaintiff:
Laura Bowers and Wesley Bowers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bowers v. USA
as 5:2023cv01643
Petitioner:
Nicholas B. Bowers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
FILING ERROR
as 4:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
rosemary mozuch, charles mozuch, james saling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Mozuch et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al.
as 4:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
rosemary mozuch, charles mozuch, james saling and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv04253
Plaintiff:
Laura Bowers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bower v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03890
Plaintiff:
Kathy Bower
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. Bowers
as 3:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Cook
Defendant:
Mrs. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
