Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bowling v. GEICO Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Suni Bowling
Defendant:
GEICO Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mehta v. Victoria Partners et al
as 2:2021cv01493
Plaintiff:
Kirti A. Mehta
Defendant:
Victoria Partners doing business as Park-Mgm Casino & Hotel Operator, Ann Hoff, London Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bowling v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv00960
Defendant:
Marcus Brown, IQS Insurance Risk Retention Group Inc. and Southern Refrigerated Transport Inc.
Plaintiff:
Candyce Bowling
Interested Party:
Medport LA, LLC
Bowles v. Peterson et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Danielle Richard, M. Sullivan, D. Richard and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Wilford Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osawe v. Tinsley et al
as 3:2018cv00600
Defendant:
TODD PARDINI, WILLIAM LYONS, JENNIFER TINSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
COURAGE OSAWE and Courage Uhumwnoma Osawe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Abadjian et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02321
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bradford, Narcisco Rene Aguilar, Dorothy Barbee and others
Defendant:
Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
N/A
as 3:2018cv00599
Defendant:
TODD PARDINI, WILLIAM LYONS, JENNIFER TINSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bowles v. Baca et al
as 3:2018cv00272
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt and Adam P. Laxalt
Petitioner:
Travis Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meisler v. Chrzanowski et al
as 3:2017cv00638
Defendant:
Maria Bowling, Nadine Chrzanowski, Karen Dustman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Meisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
