Cases 31 - 40 of 59
PARISH et al v. BOWLING et al
as 2:2011cv07426
Plaintiff:
SEAN A. PARISH and SHANAKA BERRY
Defendant:
JOHN W. BOWLING and MOUNT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLES et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv47875
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOWLES , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOWLES-BEY v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 2:2011cv05485
Plaintiff:
MARY K BOWLES-BEY
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BOWLES v. MOORE et al
as 2:2011cv02637
Defendant:
JOHN E. MOORE, CHRIS JONES and LATIA JONES
Plaintiff:
MARY K. BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLES et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64019
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BOWLES and BERTA BOWLES
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION and EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MORGAN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv84925
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. MORGAN and LISA M BOWLING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLES et al v. ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
as 2:2010cv83221
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM I. BOWLES
Defendant:
ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLES v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80498
Plaintiff:
MARVIN A. BOWLES
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
