Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Gordon v. Unknown Party, et al
as 20-17296
Defendant / Appellee:
ENGLAND, Health Service Administrator, Tucson Arizona, BEHLE, Lieutenant, AUSP Thomson, Illinois, UNKNOWN PARTY, Medical Doctor, Coleman Florida and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Dale Frank Maisano v. Karen Barcklay-Dodson, et al
as 17-16258
Plaintiff:
CARL FISHMAN and KENNETH D. MEINHARDT
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN BARCKLAY-DODSON, Medical Director Doctor, ELIJAH JORDAN, Doctor; MD, UNKNOWN JACOBSON, Deputy Warden and others
Movant - Appellant:
DALE FRANK MAISANO
Albert Curiel v. USA
as 14-55922
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT CURIEL, AKA Dan Boyer, AKA Albert Cortes, AKA Albert Curiel Cortes, AKA Albert Cortez, AKA Albert Cortes Curiel, AKA Albert Cortez Curiel, AKA Huero Cortes Curiel, AKA Guerro, AKA Hudeo, AKA Huero
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Albert Curiel
as 14-55757
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERT CURIEL, AKA Dan Boyer, AKA Albert Cortes, AKA Albert Curiel Cortes, AKA Albert Cortez, AKA Albert Cortes Curiel, AKA Albert Cortez Curiel, AKA Huero Cortes Curiel, AKA Guerro, AKA Hudeo, AKA Huero
USA v. Albert Curiel
as 14-55616
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERT CURIEL, AKA Dan Boyer, AKA Albert Cortes, AKA Albert Curiel Cortes, AKA Albert Cortez, AKA Albert Cortes Curiel, AKA Albert Cortez Curiel, AKA Huero Cortes Curiel, AKA Guerro, AKA Hudeo, AKA Huero
Richard Boyer v. Kevin Chappell
as 13-99006
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD DELMER BOYER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden
Claude Smith v. C. Boyer, et al
as 12-16519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAUDE RAYMOND SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
C. BOYER and D.D. ORTIZ
Andrew Boyer v. Brian Belleque
as 10-35574
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW LEE BOYER
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN BELLEQUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
