Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06074
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Boyer v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv03023
Plaintiff:
Marlys Boyer
Defendant:
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Eat Me Lures, Inc. et al v. Eat Me Tackle, Inc., et al
as 6:2008cv06303
Plaintiff:
Eat Me Lures, Inc. and Robert J. Boyer
Defendant:
Eat Me Tackle, Inc., and Jerry E. Nutt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keeney v. Killmer et al
as 6:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Charles Steven Keeney
Defendant:
Gary Killmer, Jeff Boyer, S. Houtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00776
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
503) 972-7050 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ray v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Ray
Defendant:
State of Oregon, State of Oregon, State of Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
