Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Lefcourt v. Ing Groep N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv02667
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lefcourt and Jeffrey Lefcourt
Defendant:
Ing Groep N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Stitching ING Aandelen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diggs v. Ing Groep N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv02038
Plaintiff:
Deadre D. Diggs
Defendant:
Ing Groep N.V., Jan H.M. Hommen, Henk Breukink and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hathorn v. Ing Groep N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv01820
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hathorn, Jeffrey Hathorn, Jeffrey Hathorn and others
Defendant:
Ing Groep N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Stichting ING Aandelen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell et al v. Ing Groep N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv01410
Plaintiff:
Harold H. Powell, Harold H. Powell, Harold H. Powell and others
Defendant:
Ing Groep N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Stichting ING Aandelen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caraballo v. Ing Groep N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv01284
Plaintiff:
Nelson Caraballo, Nelson Caraballo, Nelson Caraballo and others
Defendant:
Ing Groep N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Stichting ING Aandelen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzalez v. Woods et al
as 9:2008cv00629
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gonzalez
Defendant:
Robert K. Woods, John W. Grow, N. Bezio and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyer v. Conway
as 9:2008cv00005
Petitioner:
Eric Boyer
Respondent:
James Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boyer v. Miles
as 9:2007cv00640
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Boyer
Respondent:
Howard Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
