Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, et al v. Donald Claycomb, et al
as 14-1145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, Michael Barrett, IV, Jacob Curliss and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald M. Claycomb, in his official capacity as President of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, Toni R. Schwartz, in her official capacity as member of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, John Klebba, in his official capacity as member of Linn State Technical College Board of Regents and others
Defendant:
Christopher T. Davidson and Member, Linn State Technical College Board of Regents
Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, et al v. Donald Claycomb, et al
as 13-3264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, Michael Barrett, IV, Jacob Curliss and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald M. Claycomb, in his official capacity as President of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, Toni R. Schwartz, in her official capacity as member of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, John Klebba, in his official capacity as member of Linn State Technical College Board of Regents and others
Defendant:
Christopher T. Davidson, J. Scott Christian, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Regents for Linn State Technical College and Member, Linn State Technical College Board of Regents
Michael Barrett, IV, et al v. Donald Claycomb, et al
as 12-1001
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Michael Barrett, IV, Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, Jacob Curliss and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald M. Claycomb, in his official capacity as President of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, Toni R. Schwartz, in her official capacity as member of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, John Klebba, in his official capacity as member of Linn State Technical College Board of Regents and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
