Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Gerald Locke, Sr. v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al
as 24-1920
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General of South Dakota
Earl Dowty v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-1606
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Two Bulls v. Fluke et al
as 4:2024cv04046
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl Two Bulls
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
East v. Fluke et al
as 4:2024cv04030
Petitioner:
Donald George East
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wahl v. Fluke et al
as 3:2024cv03002
Petitioner:
James Christopher Wahl
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Grady v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-1094
Petitioner:
Adam Owen Grady
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Dowty v. Fluke
as 3:2024cv03001
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and The Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Koskan v. Wasko et al
as 4:2024cv04006
Plaintiff:
Joel Koskan
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke, Alejandro Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPeek v. Fluke et al
as 4:2023cv04199
Petitioner:
Travis R. McPeek
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grady v. Pennington County et al
as 5:2023cv05081
Plaintiff:
Adam Owen Grady
Defendant:
Pennington County, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
