Cases 1 - 10 of 840
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hawn v. Clallam County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05310
Plaintiff:
Daniel WJ Hawn
Defendant:
Clallam County Jail, Brian King, Clallam County Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michalek v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv05289
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Michalek
Defendant:
Hopkins, Wright-Brown, Lungsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05294
Plaintiff:
Brian J Cody
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stotts et al v. American National Property and Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Amy Stotts and Brian Stotts
Defendant:
American National Property and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
