Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TATE v. GEORGIA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
ELBERT ROMAN TATE
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
DARIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHNSON STATE PRISON, Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. CHAMBERS et al
as 4:2021cv00161
Petitioner:
DARRYL BEARNARD CURRY
Respondent:
Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS and WARDEN DESHAWN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. CHAMBERS
as 5:2021cv00185
Petitioner:
RONALD TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLACK v. RAYBURN et al
as 4:2020cv00249
Defendant:
Correctional Officer HEDDEN, Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS, Nurse KIM RAYBURN and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME W BLACK, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. WARD et al
as 4:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MYRON TAYLOR, II
Defendant:
Head Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS, Head Warden REAGAN BLACK, Commissioner TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KERCH v WARD et al
as 4:2019cv00105
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP NATHAN KERCH
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD and BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 7:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, Capt KRAKE, Capt JAVAKA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
