Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Musgrove v. Young et al
as 1:2026cv00152
Plaintiff:
Theodore E. Musgrove
Defendant:
Young, Ruth, James Fraiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musgrove v. Marsh et al
as 1:2026cv00102
Plaintiff:
Theodore E Musgrove
Defendant:
Kyle Marsh, H. Bergin and Brian Crowl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Crowl, et al.
as 1:2025cv00684
Plaintiff:
Austin J. Welch
Defendant:
Cpt. Brian Crowl, Lt. Miguel Tamez, Natasha Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musgrove v. Marsh, et al.
as 25-5640
Plaintiff:
THEODORE E. MUSGROVE
Defendant:
KYLE MARSH, I.M.S.I. Officer, H. BERGIN, I.M.S.I. Officer and BRIAN CROWL, I.M.S.I. Captain
Musgrove v. Marsh, et al.
as 1:2025cv00327
Plaintiff:
Theodore E Musgrove
Defendant:
Kyle Marsh, H. Bergin and Brian Crowl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templin v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert Templin
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Centurion of Idaho, LLC, MHM Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musgrove v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00522
Petitioner:
Theodore E Musgrove
Respondent:
Patrick McDonald, Mike Matthews, Terry Kirkham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROWL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02314
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CROWL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lance Ocampo v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 20-35990
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH BOLIN, JOHN/JANE DOES, 1-10, PATTI SCHMITT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE GORDON OCAMPO
Ocampo v. Corizon LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Lance Gordan Ocampo
Defendant:
Corizon LLC , Dianna Collins, Amy Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
