Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hutchins v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Brian Hutchins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutchins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Brian Hutchins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edison v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Steven Edison
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas, Brian Hutchins, Robert Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
as 9:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Brian Hutchins
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Brian Hutchins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutchins v. Franklin et al
as 9:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Brian Hutchins
Defendant:
Melissa Franklin and IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchins v. The State Of Texas et al
as 9:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Brian Hutchins
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Camino Real Emergency Associates and UTMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins v. Gibson et al
as 9:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brian Hutchins
Defendant:
C Gibson and T Ringo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins v. TDCJ - Polunsky Unit et al
as 9:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Brian Hutchins
Defendant:
TDCJ - Polunsky Unit, Roy Nanez, CHI St Lukes Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins v. TDCJ - Polunsky Unit
as 9:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Brian Hutchins
Respondent:
TDCJ - Polunsky Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
