Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Miller
as 2:2022cv01726
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Brian Johnson
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold Flores v. City of Lakewood, et al
as 16-36054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAKEWOOD, DON ANDERSON, LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Flores v. City of Lakewood et al
as 3:2015cv05013
Plaintiff:
Arnold Flores
Defendant:
City of Lakewood , Don Anderson , Lakewood Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alesi v. Bailey et al
as 1:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
Frank Alesi
Defendant:
Carley Bailey, Tim Wenglar, Tom Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alesi v. Bailey et al
as 1:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
Frank Alesi
Defendant:
Carley Bailey, Tim Wengler, Tom Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loftis v. Ellis et al
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Kirk Loftis
Defendant:
Jason Ellis, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Wolf v. C. Otter, et al
as 13-36016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
C. L. OTTER, (Butch), IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY and others
Wolf v. Otter et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stover v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jessika Ellen Stover
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, John Doe 001, John Doe 002 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hayes v. CCA, et al
as 12-35642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Maryland corporation, JOHN FERGUSON, CEO, CCA, IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
