Cases 1 - 10 of 659
Moore v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, Terry Barnard, Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Presley v. Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles, et al
as 23-10489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, LLOYD J. SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 23-10146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-14263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-13438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, ROBERT TOOLE, DELOACH, FNU and others
PRESLEY v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, LLOYD J SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-12830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Sheets v. Preist et al
as 1:2022cv03055
Plaintiff:
Mulik Sheets
Defendant:
Terell Preist and Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-12367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
