Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ODOM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINSTRATORS AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF KEVIN BONNERS et al v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2023cv03585
Plaintiff:
DAWN ODOM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINSTRATORS AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF KEVIN BONNERS, KEVIN KEVIN BONNERS, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINSTRATORS AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF KEVIN BONNERS and THE ESTATE OF KEVIN BONNERS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN RIORDAN, individually and his official capacity as the Director of the Essex County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYES v. WHITE et al
as 2:2010cv04861
Plaintiff:
EDWIN REYES
Defendant:
ALVIN WHITE, ERIC WILLIAMS , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Treffy v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv09327
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Treffy
Defendant:
The City of New York, Martin F. Horn, Brian Riordan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad v. Horn et al
as 1:2007cv08112
Plaintiff:
Robert Muhammad
Defendant:
Martin F. Horn, Imam Umar and Brian Riordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Agueda v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv02087
Plaintiff:
John Agueda
Defendant:
The City of New York, The City of New York, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zimmerman v. The New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Paul Zimmerman
Defendant:
The New York City Department of Corrections, The New York City Department of Corrections, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
