Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cheung Hing Digital Limited v. Wu et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Defendant:
Hai Xing Qiao, Guangwei "William" Wu, Starfish Bridge Express and others
Plaintiff:
Cheung Hing Digital Limited
Trustee:
TD Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Aboussa et al v. Community Bridges
as 1:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Ekoue Dodji Aboussa and Paul Akouete Aboussa
Defendant:
Community Bridges and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woodham v. Bridges et al
as 1:2021fp00601
Plaintiff:
Grace Woodham
Defendant:
Chris Bridges, FNU Diamond, Plymouth PD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridge v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Bridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hadley et al v. Home Bridge Financial services et al
as 1:2019cv00866
Defendant:
Corporate Headquarters, Home Bridge Financial services and Home Bridge
Plaintiff:
Donna L. Hadley and Jamal Hadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bridges et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00591
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Janice A. Bridges and Phillip S. Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Alicia Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
