Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BUVEL et al v. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO.
as 3:2022cv06449
Plaintiff:
LYNDA BUVEL, JOY M CORSON, DAN KALIE and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BERNSTEIN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. et al
as 2:2021cv20452
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO., MARK J. ALLES, M.D. GIOVANNI CAFORIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. et al
as 2:2021cv18695
Plaintiff:
ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. and ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS US, INC.
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO., CELGENE CORP. and CELGENE INTERNATIONAL II SARL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. et al
as 3:2021cv18695
Plaintiff:
ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. and ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS US, INC.
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO., CELGENE CORP. and CELGENE INTERNATIONAL II SARL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
as 3:2020cv03229
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MONTGOMERY v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO.
as 3:2019cv19948
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
