Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hindu-Robles v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2017cv05487
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital, Jane Roe(s), John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Nicholas Hindu-Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howe v. Mendez, M.D. et al
as 1:2017cv02912
Defendant:
Charles B. Wang Community Health Center, Sylvie Desouza, M.D., Howard Friedman, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Howe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Matthias v. Byer, M.D. et al
as 1:2017cv02546
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn Plaza Medical Center, P.C., Errol Byer, M.D., Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Janelle Matthias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Dyer v. Family Court et al
as 1:2016cv06876
Defendant:
ACS, Aimee Ambush, Piyali Basak and others
Plaintiff:
Ivree Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anthony v. Garica et al
as 1:2016cv01122
Defendant:
Ms. Altman, Brooklyn Hospital Staff, Ms. Garica and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bascom v. Brooklyn Hospital
as 1:2014cv05703
Plaintiff:
Dr. Eglon Bascom
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Giraldo v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2014cv05568
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center, United States Marshal Service Brooklyn Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Roque Felix Genao Giraldo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
