Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brooks Sports Inc v. Skechers USA Inc
as 2:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc. and Brooks Sports Inc
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Sketchers USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
PUMA SE et al v. Brooks Sports Inc
as 2:2023cv00116
Counter Defendant:
PUMA SE and PUMA North America Inc
Counter Claimant:
Brooks Sports Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. et al v. Brooks Sports, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04436
Plaintiff:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II
Defendant:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Brooks Sports Inc v. Sparc Group LLC
as 2:2020cv01491
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc. and Brooks Sports Inc
Defendant:
Sparc Group, LLC and Sparc Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Brooks Brothers Group, Inc. and Brooks Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Brooks Sports Inc v. Brooks Brothers Group Inc
as 2:2020cv00207
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports Inc
Defendant:
Brooks Brothers Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
as 2:2018mc00149
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Respondent:
Times 10 Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Co., Ltd.
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta (China) Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2018mc00129
Respondent:
Shoe Palace Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Ltd., Inc.
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
as 2:2018mc00116
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Co., Ltd.
Distribuidora Industrial De Calzado SA v. Brooks Sports, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00501
Plaintiff:
Distribuidora Industrial De Calzado SA
Defendant:
Brooks Sports Inc , Justin Dempsey Chiam and Regency Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
