Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Cavett v. Collier
as 6:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Canfield v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Canfield
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merryman v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Bruce R Merryman
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Reginald Chambers and Kevin Attaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Demico Stanley
Defendant:
Executive Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Collier
as 9:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Jimmy Smith, Warden Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Bryan A Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
