Cases 1 - 10 of 950
Propes Jr. v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 4:2024cv01778
Plaintiff:
Paul A Propes Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Fitzpatrick, Bryan Collier and Justice Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewell v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Larry Gene Sewell
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. Warden Via Lobos et al
as 4:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Robert H Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Via Lobos, Bryan Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier - TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Tracy Lynn Jackson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Collier
as 4:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaGaite v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Luis Santos LaGaite
Defendant:
Senior Warden Gene Miller, Asst. Warden Annette Marquez, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
