Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
John Louis Atkins
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Collier
as 4:2023cv00941
Petitioner:
David Wayne Black
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
David Wayne Black
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Bryan A Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Collier
as 3:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Bryan A Smith
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith Jr v. Collier
as 3:2023cv01594
Petitioner:
Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00782
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Kennedy
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pacheco-Morales v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albarado v. Cozby et al
as 3:2023cv01252
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Jennifer Cozby, Bryan Collier and TDCJ - State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
