Cases 1 - 10 of 1,045
Duncan v. Warden Via Lobos et al
as 4:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Robert H Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Via Lobos, Bryan Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewell v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Larry Gene Sewell
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Jackson v. Collier
as 4:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gauna
as 24-40278
Plaintiff:
Jemadari Chinua Williams
Defendant:
Joel Gauna, Region IV Director, TDCJ, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, FNU Hall and others
Jackson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaGaite v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Luis Santos LaGaite
Defendant:
Senior Warden Gene Miller, Asst. Warden Annette Marquez, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rehart v. TDCJ
as 24-10354
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Rehart
Defendant:
TDCJ, Danny C. Diaz, Cellmate at TDCJ, OIfficer FNU Blackshire, Officer at TDCJ and others
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kopatz v. John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Brian Kopatz
Defendant:
John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit, John Doe, UCC-Telford Unit, Brandy Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
