Cases 31 - 40 of 915
Rivens-Baker, Jr. v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, P. Samaniego, Andres Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zurovetz v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Zurovetz and Todd Micheal Zurovetz
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Beverly Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00847
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00848
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Demico Stanley
Defendant:
Executive Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Judge Ana Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04478
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Judge Ana Martinez, Bryan Collier, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Corey Cortez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
