Cases 41 - 50 of 1,143
Williams v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ivery Clark Williams
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Milton Bates
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Timothy Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. Fort Bend County et al
as 4:2023cv04836
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Fort Bend County, Fort Bend County Sheriff's Office, David M. Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanous v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Vanous
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker, Jr. v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, P. Samaniego, Andres Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zurovetz v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Zurovetz and Todd Micheal Zurovetz
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Beverly Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00847
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00848
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Demico Stanley
Defendant:
Executive Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
