Cases 41 - 50 of 1,151
Vanous v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Vanous
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Milburn Bates
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Timothy Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Milton Bates
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Timothy Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patterson v. Collier
as 9:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivens-Baker, Jr. v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, P. Samaniego, Andres Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merryman v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Bruce R Merryman
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Reginald Chambers and Kevin Attaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Judge Ana Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04478
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Judge Ana Martinez, Bryan Collier, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Jimmy Smith, Warden Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morton et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Morton, Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Dr. Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
