Cases 71 - 80 of 948
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Asst Warden Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brooks v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Brooks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Edmundo Cueto, Jr. and Cirildo Puente, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Collier
as 4:2023cv00941
Petitioner:
David Wayne Black
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
David Wayne Black
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael Doc Weaver
Defendant:
Jimmy Smith, David Reitsma, Tina S. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2023cv02479
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ortiz
Defendant:
Moises Villalobos, Clarance L Houston, Sekou Dolley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
