Cases 41 - 50 of 945
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Morton et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Morton, Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Dr. Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Collier
as 9:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Jimmy Smith, Warden Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGrew v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGrew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bryan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Collier
as 3:2023cv02495
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
