Cases 41 - 50 of 946
Lewis v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Corey Cortez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00847
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00848
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zurovetz v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Zurovetz and Todd Micheal Zurovetz
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Beverly Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Speer v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv03958
Plaintiff:
William Keith Speer
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hayes et al
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Demenzia Montwell Mitchell
Defendant:
Bridgette Y Hayes, Chrystal W Wagner and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Demico Stanley
Defendant:
Executive Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
