Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Bryan Dean Ransom v. Dave Davey
as 14-71626
Petitioner:
BRYAN DEAN RANSOM
Respondent:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden
Womack v. Jone
as 13-7050
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRYAN DEAN WOMACK
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, DOC Director
Terrance Cabalce, et al v. VSE Corporation, et al
as 13-15256
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TERRANCE D. CABALCE, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bryan Dean Cabalce and GAIL S. CABALCE
Defendant:
THOMAS E. BLANCHARD & ASSOCIATES, INC., RICHARD BRATT, HIDC SMALL BUSINESS STORAGE LLC and others
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
VSE CORPORATION
Third-party-defendant:
DONALD ENTERPRISES, INC. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Womack v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00399
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womack v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv00944
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cabalce et al v. VSE Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Terrance D. Cabalce , Bryan Dean Cabalce and Gail S. Cabalce
Defendant:
VSE Corporation , Thomas E. Blanchard & Associates, Inc., Richard Bratt and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Donaldson Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
VSE Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Womack v. Chester et al
as 6:2011cv00372
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
C. Chester and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Womack v. Chester et al
as 5:2011cv01129
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
C Chester and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04733
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
