Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Johnson v. Cooke et al
as 1:2015cv21790
Plaintiff:
Harvey R Johnson
Defendant:
Jason Cooke, Kenny Atkinson, Bryan Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cooke et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Harvey R. Johnson
Defendant:
Jason Cooke, Kenny Atkinson, Bryan Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. Laird, et al
as 13-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
In re: Stine, et al
as 13-3257
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
Pinson, et al v. Laird, et al
as 13-3176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE and ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, GORDON HARPE and others
Hipps v. Laird et al
as 5:2013cv03102
Plaintiff:
Charles Hipps
Defendant:
Paul Laird, Amber Nelson, Gordon Harpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stine v. Laird et al
as 5:2013cv03101
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Paul Laird, Amber Nelson, Gordon Harpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In re: Pinson, et al, et al
as 13-3143
Petitioner:
In re: JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, CHARLES HIPPS and MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
PAUL LAIRD, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
Pinson et al v. Laird et al
as 5:2013cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson, Mikeal Glenn Stine and Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Paul Laird, Amber Nelson, Gordon Harpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
