Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BUELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv06746
Plaintiff:
JANICE BUELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HORNE v. CITY OF CLIFTON et al
as 2:2018cv13096
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-3 (A fictitious name), C. Phillips PO, PO Velez and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. DONELL HORNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LANKFORD v. CITY OF CLIFTON, et al
as 2:2018cv06643
Plaintiff:
JAQUICE LANKFORD
Defendant:
CITY OF CLIFTON, CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , ALAN ALAN FIORILLA and others
Cross_claimant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , JUAN VELEZ and others
Cross_defendant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , THOMAS BUELL, JUAN VELEZ and others
Counter_claimant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUAN VELEZ
Counter_defendant:
JAQUICE LANKFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yuan et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 3:2013cv07664
Plaintiff:
Helen Yuan , Robert J Evans , Joseph F Meglino, Sr and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walden et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03656
Plaintiff:
Virgil Walden, Jr. , Ronald Thompson , JAMES HERRING and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCORMICK et al v. MENU FOODS INC et al
as 1:2008cv00960
Plaintiff:
MONNA MCCORMICK, MICHELE THRASH, PERRY K. ALLISON and others
Defendant:
MENU FOODS INC, MENU FOODS GEN PAR LIMITED and MENU FOODS INCOME FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
