Cases 31 - 40 of 275
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. Haaland et al
as 3:2021cv03018
Plaintiff:
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe
Defendant:
Hon. Deb Haaland, United States Department of Interior, Bryan Newland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Block et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv01025
Plaintiff:
Bruce Block and Janice Block
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Choc Harper, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-71241
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CHOC HARPER, HARLEY REYNOLDS and SAMUEL L. BIERS
Petitioner:
CHOC HARPER
Respondent:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BRYAN BOWKER, in his official capacity as the Western Regional Director Bureau of Indian Affairs, THE COURT OF INDIAN OFFENSES FOR THE WESTERN REGION-ELKO and others
Backcountry Against Dumps, et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 21-55869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BACKCOUNTRY AGAINST DUMPS, DONNA TISDALE and JOE E. TISDALE
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DARRYL LACOUNTE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, AMY DUTSCHKE, in her official capacity as Regional Director of the Pacific Region of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
TERRA-GEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC and CAMPO BAND OF DIEGUENO MISSION INDIANS
Paul Grondal, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35507
Defendant:
ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC
KANAM et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv01690
Plaintiff:
Pilchuck Nation and KURT KANAM
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, BRYAN NEWLAND, DARRYL LACOUNTE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Eastern Band of Cherokee, et al v. DOI, et al
as 21-5126
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior, Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sonya A. Beaty, Donna M. Landers, James Edward McLeymore and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Catawba Indian Nation
Not Yet Classified:
Cherokee Nation
State of Kansas ex rel Kobach, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-3097
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAC AND FOX NATION OF MISSOURI IN KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, CITY OF MULVANE, KANSAS and others
Eastern Band of Cherokee, et al v. DOI, et al
as 21-5114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wanda Clark, Jason C. McLeymore, John Charles McLeymore and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, R. Glenn Melville, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director for the Bureau of Indian Affairs Eastern Regional Office, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Catawba Indian Nation
Not Yet Classified:
Cherokee Nation
Muscogee (Creek) Nation, et al v. Buford Rollin, et al
as 21-11643
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL PARKS, POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS, a federally recognized tribe, DAVID VELA, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HICKORY GROUND TRIBAL TOWN, GEORGE THOMPSON, Mekko, individually and as traditional representative of the lineal descendants of those buried at Hickory Ground Tribal Town in Wetumpka, Alabama and MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
