Cases 1 - 10 of 348
Fox v. Fed Bur of Prisons
as 24-30051
Petitioner:
Arnold Eugene Fox, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Felipe Martinez
Fitch v. Garland
as 24-40017
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Christopher Wray, Official Capacity as Director of F.B.I., Michael Carvajal, Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
West v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-30353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Joseph West, Individually and on behalf of J F W
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Norman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-10478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexis C. Norman
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Michael Carvaial, Michael Smith, Medical Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Zimmerman v. Fed Bur of Prisons
as 23-60242
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jack Zimmerman
Respondent / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Malachowski v. USA
as 23-10426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcel Malachowski
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Billy Keith, Warden, FCI Big Spring and others
Deem v. Garrido
as 23-30169
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Lynn Deem, also known as Steve Deem
Respondent / Appellee:
F. J. Garrido, Bureau of Prisons
Adams v. Shelby
as 23-20108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Tammy Shelby, Central Grievance Office, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Mike Piasiensk, Inspector General and others
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff
as 23-10268
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent / Appellee:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Cabello v. Tellez
as 23-50155
Petitioner / Appellant:
Archie Cabello
Respondent / Appellee:
Regional Director Tellez, Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
