Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Howard v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
David M. Howard
Defendant:
The United States of America, The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Larry Cochran
Defendant:
Warden, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McKay v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2021cv01228
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Maurice McKay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. United States Of America et al
as 8:2020cv02653
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Ashland Federal Correctional Institution, United States Of America and others
Plaintiff:
John David White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Alexander v. Carvajal et al
as 8:2020cv02420
Plaintiff:
Morris Alexander
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Jesse Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Head v. All Mailroom Officers of FCI Cumberland Prison et al
as 1:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
Charles Head
Defendant:
S. Eirich, Warden J.R. Bell, All Mailroom Officers of FCI Cumberland Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gorbey v. Huff et al
as 1:2019cv02530
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and D. Huff
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bailey v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv01518
Respondent:
Bureau of Prison (BOP), Warden NBCI Frank Bishop, Commissioner (DOC) LaVale and others
Petitioner:
Thomas Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
