Cases 21 - 30 of 1,076
Lugo v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Victor Lugo
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Brigette D Williams
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. BOP
as 4:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Smith
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Central Grievance Office et al
as 6:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Central Grievance Office, Captain FNU Defoor, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Gordon et al
as 6:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Athony Gordon, Central Grievance Office, Mike Ptasiensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Said v. Moreno et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Islam Yaser-Ab Said
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Moreno, Dr. FNU Wheat, Dr. FNU Winger and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
James Pierce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 6:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
