Cases 31 - 40 of 1,076
Gozo v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Makusha Gozo
Defendant:
Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv01159
Petitioner:
Phillip McElroy and Phillip Samuel McElroy
Respondent:
United States of America, Freddy Garrido, Warden Garrido and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gozo v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Makusha Gozo
Defendant:
Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer FNU Derry and FNU Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 9:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 6:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 6:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 4:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Officer FNU Derry, FNU Cates and Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2022cv04432
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer Derry and FCI Seagoville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
