Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1036
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMAX SUPERINTENDENT CUSTODIAN, UNITED STATES PORBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF COLORADO and others
Palmera Pineda v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Juvenal Ovidio Palmera Pineda, Juvenal Ovidio Ricardo Palmera Pineda and Simon Trinidad
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2021cv01503
Defendant:
J. Fox, Chris Synsvoll, SIS Tech Kerri Lewis-Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6099
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6088
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Velasco v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2015cv02756
Plaintiff:
Ismael Lee Velasco
Defendant:
Hernandez, Maldonado, M.A. Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 1:2015cv02627
Plaintiff:
Antoine M. Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and F. DAVIS
Hall v. Shumard et al
as 1:2015cv01949
Plaintiff:
Carl Hall
Defendant:
Shumard, John Oliver and Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 1:2015cv01780
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
