Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Chad Logan, The v. Busch et al
as 2:2022cv02087
Plaintiff:
Estate of Chad Logan, The
Defendant:
Thomas S. Busch and Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Pennington et al v. Saint Francis Community Services et al
as 6:2017cv01282
Plaintiff:
Bruce Clement Pennington, Jr. and Vanessa Kay Oller
Defendant:
Saint Francis Community Services, Cassie Allen, Mary Busch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krohn et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07951
Plaintiff:
Ben Krohn , Brandon James Croat , David E. Krueger and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation
as 2:2014md02591
Plaintiff:
Eagle-View Dairy, LLC, Michael D. Tiede, Frank Hagenmaier and others
Petitioner:
Law Offices of Michael Miller, PC, Call & Gentry Law Group, LLC, Gellhaus & Gellhaus, PC and others
Other:
Harry G. Barber, Jr. and Sharon Brunet
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Syngenta Crop Protection AG
Defendant:
Bunge North America, Inc.
Interested Party:
Nolan Law Group and Lowe Eklund Wakefield Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
COPE et al v. Kansas State Board of Education et al
as 5:2013cv04119
Plaintiff:
COPE , Carl Reimer , Mary Angela Reimer and others
Defendant:
Kansas State Board of Education , Janet Waugh , Steve Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. et al v. Premier Beverage, Inc.
as 6:2007cv01064
Plaintiff:
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and InBev USA, LLC
Defendant:
Premier Beverage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
