Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Lakeisha Adams v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-31004
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAKEISHA SHANAE ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Darius Patterson v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 14-30747
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARIUS PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kimberlin Edwards v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-30733
Petitioner - Appellant:
KIMBERLIN EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Richard Miller v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 14-30441
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD NATHANIEL MILLER, also known as Richard J. Miller
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS and STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Humberto Vargas v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 14-30064
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUMBERTO VARGAS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Carl Payne v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 13-31288
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Eugene Moore v. Robert Henderson
as 13-30328
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE HENRY MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT Y. HENDERSON, Warden, C. Paul Phelps Correctional Center
David Foreman v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 12-31262
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID FOREMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Moore v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 2:2012cv02540
Plaintiff:
Eugene Henry Moore
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terry v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 5:2012cv02344
Plaintiff:
Pat Terry
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
